Case study · Healthcare

Admissions that no longer wait on a missing consent form

A hospital admissions office assembling patient files from referrals, payers and patients themselves, where one missing page delayed a scheduled procedure.

The client

Who they are.

A hospital admissions office. It assembles a patient file from three sources it does not control — the referring practice, the payer, and the patient — and has to have it complete on the morning of a scheduled procedure.

Anonymised at the client’s request. Client names are never disclosed without written permission.

58kadmissions per year
7documents per file
9 minsaved per file
The task

What had to be solved.

Clerks re-read every file on the day of admission to confirm nothing was missing. A missing consent form was often discovered when the patient had already arrived, and clinical staff were pulled into administrative chasing.

The goal

What success looked like.

  • Establish completeness days before the admission date, not on it
  • Ask the patient or referrer once, for the exact missing page
  • Keep clinical staff out of document chasing
The solution

What Ceertia does here.

A use case per procedure type, declaring the documents an admission file requires — including one signed consent per listed procedure. Files are checked as documents arrive, so the gap is known and requested while there is still time.

A real rule One rule, as it runs.

A signed consent form must be present for every procedure listed on the admission plan.

The procedure

How it runs, step by step.

1
Intake

The file arrives with its documents, in any format, from whoever sends it.

Referral letterInsurance authorisationConsent formsIdentity documentPrior recordsPre-admission checklist
2
Recognition & classification

Every page is identified and mapped against the expected document list. Missing documents, duplicates and out-of-scope pages are flagged on receipt.

3
Verification

Each rule asks the file a question and answers it directly on the documents, with page, zone and source text attached to the verdict.

4
Arbitration

The team approves, requests a fix, or rejects. No file is approved or rejected automatically.

The result

What changed.

Admission day now starts with a file that is already complete. The consent form found missing at the bedside — the failure that cost the most and embarrassed everyone — largely stopped happening.

Before
  • Clerks re-read every file the morning of admission to confirm nothing was missing.
  • A missing consent was discovered when the patient had already arrived.
  • Clinical staff were pulled into administrative chasing.
After
  • Files are checked as documents arrive, days before the admission date.
  • The patient or referrer is asked for the exact missing page, once.
  • Admission day starts with a file that is already complete.

Anonymised case. Client names are never disclosed without written permission. Figures describe the file volumes and checks in this scenario.

Healthcare → All case studies

See it run on your own files.

Bring one real file to a 30-minute demo. Watch the verification run, evidence on screen.