Case study · Healthcare

Admissions that no longer wait on a missing consent form

A hospital admissions office assembling patient files from referrals, payers and patients themselves, where one missing page delayed a scheduled procedure.

The client

Who they are.

A hospital admissions office. It assembles a patient file from three sources it does not control — the referring practice, the payer, and the patient — and has to have it complete on the morning of a scheduled procedure.

Anonymised at the client’s request. Client names are never disclosed without written permission.

58kadmissions per year
7documents per file
9 minsaved per file
The task

What had to be solved.

Clerks re-read every file on the day of admission to confirm nothing was missing. A missing consent form was often discovered when the patient had already arrived, and clinical staff were pulled into administrative chasing.

The goal

What success looked like.

  • Establish completeness days before the admission date, not on it
  • Ask the patient or referrer once, for the exact missing page
  • Keep clinical staff out of document chasing
The solution

What Ceertia does here.

A use case per procedure type, declaring the documents an admission file requires — including one signed consent per listed procedure. Files are checked as documents arrive, so the gap is known and requested while there is still time.

A real rule One rule, as it runs.

A signed consent form must be present for every procedure listed on the admission plan.

The procedure

How it runs, step by step.

1
Intake

The file arrives with its documents, in any format, from whoever sends it.

Referral letterInsurance authorisationConsent formsIdentity documentPrior recordsPre-admission checklist
2
Recognition & classification

Every page is identified and mapped against the expected document list. Missing documents, duplicates and out-of-scope pages are flagged on receipt.

3
Verification

Each rule asks the file a question and answers it directly on the documents, with page, zone and source text attached to the verdict.

4
Arbitration

The team approves, requests a fix, or rejects. No file is approved or rejected automatically.

The result

What changed.

Admission day now starts with a file that is already complete. The consent form found missing at the bedside — the failure that cost the most and embarrassed everyone — largely stopped happening.

Before
  • Clerks re-read every file the morning of admission to confirm nothing was missing.
  • A missing consent was discovered when the patient had already arrived.
  • Clinical staff were pulled into administrative chasing.
After
  • Files are checked as documents arrive, days before the admission date.
  • The patient or referrer is asked for the exact missing page, once.
  • Admission day starts with a file that is already complete.

Anonymised case. Client names are never disclosed without written permission. Figures describe the file volumes and checks in this scenario.

Healthcare All case studies

See it run on your own files.

Bring one real file to a 30-minute demo. Watch the verification run, evidence on screen.